stringbook

World on a string.
Jan 26 '12
good:

Why Historic Buildings Are Greener Than LEED-Certified New OnesBy Sarah LaskowJanuary 26, 2012 

A new report from the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s Preservation Green Lab concludes that constructing new, energy-efficient buildings almost never saves as much energy as renovating old ones.
Renovated buildings outperformed new buildings on energy savings in every category: single-family homes, multifamily complexes, commercial offices, “urban village” mixed-use structures, and elementary schools … Consider that it uses more energy and creates more impact to construct an entirely new building than to fix up one of the same size for the same purpose … Green builders say fixer-uppers are often the more economical choice, too. “It costs less to take an existing building and renovate that to build a new one, at least on the projects I’ve worked on,” says Helen Kessler, a board member of the Illinois chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council. She cautions, though, that these comparisons vary from building to building: “There’s always an “it depends” about this.”

good:

Why Historic Buildings Are Greener Than LEED-Certified New Ones
By Sarah Laskow
January 26, 2012 

A new report from the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s Preservation Green Lab concludes that constructing new, energy-efficient buildings almost never saves as much energy as renovating old ones.

Renovated buildings outperformed new buildings on energy savings in every category: single-family homes, multifamily complexes, commercial offices, “urban village” mixed-use structures, and elementary schools … Consider that it uses more energy and creates more impact to construct an entirely new building than to fix up one of the same size for the same purpose … Green builders say fixer-uppers are often the more economical choice, too. “It costs less to take an existing building and renovate that to build a new one, at least on the projects I’ve worked on,” says Helen Kessler, a board member of the Illinois chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council. She cautions, though, that these comparisons vary from building to building: “There’s always an “it depends” about this.”

111 notes (via good)Tags: architecture sustainability conservation energy usgbc

  1. avis-kalsowufhp reblogged this from good
  2. sgtpeppershp reblogged this from good
  3. neonbender reblogged this from good
  4. yourabode reblogged this from good and added:
    Another reason to renovate rather than build new…
  5. gabrielcunha123 reblogged this from nickoftimela
  6. habitatsforhumans reblogged this from nickoftimela
  7. meaninglessmeandering reblogged this from nickoftimela
  8. nickoftimela reblogged this from inlikewiththecity and added:
    Go figure… Haha.
  9. gesamtkunstwerktrainspotting reblogged this from salmagundistew
  10. salmagundistew reblogged this from good
  11. baobabhugger reblogged this from good
  12. abigailgardner reblogged this from good
  13. itsthe80sinmypants reblogged this from good
  14. misantropo reblogged this from good and added:
    Riutilizzare è quasi sempre più efficiente che buttare giù e rifare da zero…
  15. j-martin reblogged this from good
  16. creamconecoffee reblogged this from good
  17. purplemorphman reblogged this from good
  18. southofthesouth reblogged this from good
  19. benderbasics reblogged this from good